Tuesday, February 16, 2010

Just imagine....

from today's CBC news website
No-pet policy for Man. renters could be outlawed
Last Updated: Monday, February 15, 2010 7:44 PM CT The Canadian Press
The fur is set to fly in Manitoba over whether landlords should be forced to accept tenants with pets.
Animal owners are lining up behind an opposition bill that, if passed into law, would outlaw no-pet rules at rental properties across the province.
"There is much greater support for this than I ever anticipated," said Liberal Leader Jon Gerrard. "There's a lot of passion when I talk about it with individual people who have to give up their pets when they move into apartments."
Since the end of January, more than 2,900 people have signed up on a Facebook page to support Gerrard's bill, which was tabled at the end of the legislature's fall sitting. Groups such as the Winnipeg Humane Society have joined the battle and are calling on the NDP government to pass the bill.
"We get elderly people in particular, or young people, forced out of apartments because they have pets. The pets have nowhere to go and they end up here," said Bill McDonald, the humane society's executive director. "I have seen far too many sad stories."
Ontario is the only other province with such legislation, McDonald said, and fewer pets have been destroyed there since the law took effect a decade ago.
Landlords not convinced
On the other side of the fence are landlords who feel they should have the freedom to choose whether to allow animals. They say some tenants have allergies, while others simply prefer to live in a pet-free building.
Ron Penner, president of the Professional Property Managers Association representing 50 landlords in Winnipeg, told a legislature committee last year that his members are "very adamant" that pets remain optional.
Gerrard's bill is expected to come to a vote in April, but at this stage appears to have little chance of becoming law. The government passed its own law last June that allows landlords to charge up to half a month's rent as a damage deposit specifically for pets.
"It is hoped that the damage deposit provision ... will encourage more landlords to welcome tenants with pets," Rachel Morgan, press secretary to Family Services Minister Gord Mackintosh, wrote in an email. "The new [law] will strike a balance between the various interest groups in this emotional issue."
"While pets can have a positive impact on people's physical and mental well-being, it is clear that these benefits are not universal. People with asthma or other respiratory conditions can experience severe reactions to pets."
NDP has supported some opposition bills
Gerrard is hopeful, however, that the government may change its mind, especially in the face of public pressure. The New Democrats have supported several opposition bills since they took power in 1999.
"What's happening now is that people sneak pets into apartments and they probably cause more problems. It's better to allow pets in apartments but doing it in a way that there are responsible rules," Gerrard said.
His bill would allow landlords to set down rules for acceptable pet behaviour and cleanliness of the rental unit — a provision he feels would appease tenants who don't want pets in their building.
The bill would also allow pet owners who felt they had been discriminated against to file a complaint with the provincial residential tenancies branch.Read more:
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/manitoba/story/2010/02/15/man-fluffys-law-facebook.html#ixzz0fi97VF5I

What an incredible idea! Everyday the sad free to a good home section is full of pet who are lost in the moving shuffle ( the subject of how some folks don't put their heart into their housing search is a separate topic that has been, and will be, pursued in a separate post)
For more information on how pet owners can keep the pets that they love , go to Preventing Homeless Pets
Legislation is always the key. When seat belt legislation was first proposed, opponents weren't sure if it was worthwhile because they couldn't imagine how it could be enforced ... until they realized that they didn't have to check each and individual car. Once the law was there ... once the penalties were in place .... each and every successful prosecution did double duty both to educate and act as a deterrent.
It is even more important with animal welfare legislation. In a complaint driven process, society inspectors do not need to inspect every home and yard. How would better legislation help? It would provide inspectors with the proper tools to react effectively on behalf of the animals. That in turn would assure good samaritans who are concerned about animals in their own neighbourhood that their complaints will do more than cause hard feelings.
What time is it? Its always time to remember the only way to reach the destination is to start the journey.

2 comments:

The 'splorin' Wolfies said...

sorry--i have to agree with the landlords on this one. we have had rentals ruined by tentants who have used an entire room for a litter box. one year later the smell of urine was still there despite a year of renovations that almost cost us our sanity. and 2 more rentals on top of this one with irresponsible pet owners. in small towns holding out for better tenants isn't always easy.

Old Maid said...

I'm sorry you guys have been burned ... but its a shame to generalize about all pet owners based on a couple of bad experiences. Speaking from experience as a renter, most pet owners are more conscientous than that.
the thing is that every landlord has also had bad experiences with young people single moms/ etc but by law they are not allowed to discrimintate by age or any other demographic either,eh?